<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel> <title>Comments on: SF Rock Climber&#8217;s Lessons in Love</title> <atom:link href="http://www.sanfranvoice.com/2007/03/sf-rock-climbers-lessons-in-love/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /> <link>http://www.sanfranvoice.com/2007/03/sf-rock-climbers-lessons-in-love/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 02:42:52 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item> <title>By: Mik</title> <link>http://www.sanfranvoice.com/2007/03/sf-rock-climbers-lessons-in-love/comment-page-1/#comment-185</link> <dc:creator>Mik</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 01:07:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sanfranvoice.com/sf-rock-climbers-lessons-in-love/#comment-185</guid> <description>We&#039;re in complete agreement. Given all of the interesting people, places, and things accessible, I must prioritize. I&#039;ve recently decided to up the priority on dating but, am not willing to give up indoor climbing. While I&#039;m seriously putting myself at a disadvantage by focusing on the pool of hot, smart brunettes that want to climb their brains out, finding such a partner will be really worth while meeting. Does your logic state I must not want to prioritize dating? Perhaps I just don&#039;t want to prioritize dating above climbing. I won’t trade a climbing session in for a blind dinner date but, I’ve made some time. Instead of surfing the likes of YouTube I’m surfing for someone that would brand a regular trip to Mission Cliffs or Planet Granite as start to a friendship or a relationship. On a scale of 1 to 10 what value do you give to climbing? In terms of relating climbing back to dating, on a scale of a 1 to 10 what value do you give dating someone with whom you share your favorite hobbies?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re in complete agreement. </p> <p>Given all of the interesting people, places, and things accessible, I must prioritize.</p> <p>I&#8217;ve recently decided to up the priority on dating but, am not willing to give up indoor climbing. While I&#8217;m seriously putting myself at a disadvantage by focusing on the pool of hot, smart brunettes that want to climb their brains out, finding such a partner will be really worth while meeting.</p> <p>Does your logic state I must not want to prioritize dating?</p> <p>Perhaps I just don&#8217;t want to prioritize dating above climbing. I won’t trade a climbing session in for a blind dinner date but, I’ve made some time. Instead of surfing the likes of YouTube I’m surfing for someone that would brand a regular trip to Mission Cliffs or Planet Granite as start to a friendship or a relationship.</p> <p>On a scale of 1 to 10 what value do you give to climbing?</p> <p>In terms of relating climbing back to dating, on a scale of a 1 to 10 what value do you give dating someone with whom you share your favorite hobbies?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>